Wednesday, January 14, 2026

THIS IS DA FISHERIES POLICY: NOW ABANDONED BY THE PARTY WHEN IN GOVT

What follows is actual DA policy on fisheries, which I wrote for the party back in 2013/2014. This remains the party's formal and actual policy position on the sector and yet despite having now overseen the SA fisheries sector since July 2024, the party has failed to even start with implementing the most basic elements of THEIR OWN POLICY. 

So, why vote for a party that refuses to even implement its own published and adopted policies, which they tell voters is what they as a party believe in and will carry out. 

The actual policy document is titled "DA POLICY ON NATURAL RESOURCES: ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, FISHERIES, WATER MANAGEMENT AND MINERAL RESOURCES" and accessible by clicking the link. 

What the DA has done since July 2024 is implement ANC fisheries policies and ensured that bad decisions  taken by Creecy continue in force. 

Bizarrely, the DA has even published a draft "transfer of fishing rights policy" which is completely fixated on race being the key criterion to determine whether a fishing right is transferred! Not ability, financial resources, history of involvement in the SA fishing sector ... but race! If the intended buyer is not black and female enough, the transfer of the fishing right is refused!

So, more than 18 months of DA governance later, and we dont have any strategy to fix fisheries; no new policies to encourage investment and growth; no plans to fix failing fishing sectors; no plan to introduce new fisheries (growth); nothing about fixing the endemic levels of corruption and incompetence that defines the (mis) management of fishing in SA. 

It's as if the DA simply sought the position of fisheries minister to earn a salary - like an ANC cadre! 

This is DA FISHERIES POLICY:

  1. Fisheries

South Africa’s vast marine exclusive economic zone of more than 1 million square miles is one of the most productive and valuable marine ecosystems on the planet. South Africa’s 22 commercial and small-scale fisheries land upward of 500 000 tons of high value and regulated fish stocks annually, worth more than R4.5 billion and sustaining some 27 000 direct jobs.

The transformation of the fisheries economy from one that has been dominated by around 400 quota holders in the pre-democratic era to one where more than 2 900 commercial and small-scale quota holders share in the 22 fishery sectors has been achieved through two successive fishing quota allocation processes in 2001/2002 and again in 2005. The allocation of ‘long-term’ fishing rights for periods of between eight and 15 years confirmed black ownership and control over fishing quotas at an impressive 60%.

The South African fisheries economy has been in the doldrums over the past eight years, shifting from one crisis to another, unable to significantly grow in size and value and unable to sustain jobs.

The DA intends to create the policy and institutional frameworks to grow the size of the South
African fisheries economy and to increase the number of jobs it sustains.

8.1. Fisheries management

The management of South Africa’s fisheries must be based on the best available scientific and local community knowledge systems, coupled with the overarching precautionary management principle.

While South Africa’s offshore fisheries are relatively well-managed, our inshore fish stocks, including lobsters, line fishes, abalone and oysters, are in an extremely sensitive biological state. Scientific recovery plans are not adhered to and illegal fishing is decimating stocks. The recovery of overexploited and collapsed fish stocks has to be prioritised. Without fish, there can be no fishing quotas.

8.2. Fishing quotas

Thousands of fishing quotas are to be re-allocated in 2013/2014 and again in 2015. The allocation of fishing quotas is an important periodic tool to fundamentally review fishery management practices and objectives. Allocation processes must be undertaken in a manner that does not halt or fundamentally disrupt the economic operation of fishing businesses (whether commercial or artisanal) and such processes must continue to encourage black investment in and ownership of fishing quotas.

Allocation processes must ensure that small-scale fishing rights are allocated to:

 Fishers who actually fish their own quotas and are able to fully benefit from their quotas.
 Fishers who reside in coastal villages and towns adjacent to these fishing areas.

Allocation of fishing quotas to commercial right holders must be prefaced on the objectives of:

 Investing in sustainable and ecologically responsible fishing practices.
 Growing full-time and part-time employment.
 Ensuring fair and safe working conditions in processing factories and on fishing vessels.
 Supporting innovation by increasing operational and bureaucratic efficiencies.
 Empowering staff and investing in skills development.

8.3. Compliance

Fisheries compliance is presently non-existent with large scale plundering of near-shore stocks, particularly abalone and lobsters. The DA’s fisheries compliance strategy is prefaced on the following compliance and monitoring pillars:

 A comprehensive re-evaluation of the suitability and skills of fishery control officers (FCO’s) and landing monitors. FCO’s and landing monitors, in particular, would be subjected to regular lifestyle audits to ensure an honest and committed enforcement and monitoring frontline. FCOs would be employed on a 24/7 basis and not restricted to working office hours only.
 Each fisheries patrol vessel would annually spend a minimum of 200 days at sea and the management and deployment of these vessels would be undertaken by professionally qualified MCS experts.
 The dedicated ‘green’ courts that proved highly successful during 2003 and 2004 would be re- established in Hermanus and new dedicated green courts opened in high poaching areas like Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Vredenburg.
 Formal funded partnerships would be established with coastal municipalities, community-based conservancy organisations and NGO’s such SEAWATCH to help combat illegal fishing and to assist with community-based preventive compliance strategies that would focus on working with coastal communities to reduce illegal and irresponsible fishing.
 The recreational fishing sector would be encouraged to help police the near shore fish stock and partnerships would be established with responsible clubs and associations to protect our marine resources and ecosystem.
 The Fisheries Branch would no longer engage in the sale of confiscated fish products.

8.4. Research

Professional and credible fisheries researchers are fundamental to a successful national fisheries management programme. Fisheries research is at the very heart of the Fisheries Branch.

Fisheries research must be premised on the principles of the best available scientific evidence and the precautionary principle. However, a critical, yet often ignored source of information on the state of fish stocks is local indigenous knowledge. Local indigenous knowledge and data of the fishing community, established fishing clubs and associations must be formally incorporated into fisheries operational management procedures and stock evaluation models.

8.5. Small-scale or artisanal fishing

South Africa has a thriving small-scale or artisanal fishing industry of more than 2 200 quota holders responsible for harvesting high value nearshore stocks such as lobsters, abalone, line fishes, oysters and hake (by handline). Small-scale fisheries extend from Port Nolloth on the North West Coast to Richards Bay on the East Coast. The sustainability of small-scale fisheries is directly threatened by high levels of poaching and irresponsible harvesting practices such as those used to harvest oysters.

South Africa’s small-scale fisheries (particularly abalone, oyster, hake handline and lobster fisheries) are not presently extracting their maximum economic value.

The DA would implement measures to increase the value of inshore fish stocks, predominantly by reducing the bureaucracy that presently strangles small-scale fisheries, by substantially reducing poaching and by introducing sustainable and greener harvesting technologies.

The key elements of the DA’s policy for small-scale fishing are as follows:

  • Fishing quotas must be allocated to individuals to avoid fronting and abuse. However, should a fishing community wish to have quotas amalgamated into a co-operative, this should also be recognised.
  • Fishing quotas must be allocated to persons who fish their own quotas.
  • Small-scale fishers must be allocated quotas in the vicinity where they live based on the internationally accepted Territorial User Rights Fishing (TURF) system so as to encourage responsible fishing and to reduce poaching.
  • Small-scale fishing quotas must be allocated for long term periods in accordance with TURF so as to encourage ‘ownership’ of fish stocks, thus reducing uncertainty.
  • The state must subsidise the costs of obtaining and maintaining small-scale fishery eco-labels so as to increase the value of these stocks, which in turn would reduce the need for larger quotas and illegal fishing.
  • The state must pay for the scrapping of unnecessary fishing capacity and must consider implementing a fishing right ‘buy-back’ programme to support the recovery of nearshore fish stocks.
  • Levies for the nearshore lobster fishery need to be reviewed and reduced as these cannot be same as for the offshore lobster sector.

8.6. Industrial fishing

South Africa’s industrial fisheries land around 90% of all commercially harvested fish, contributing some R4 billion annually to the fisheries and South African economy.

The industrial or commercial fisheries sector has been successfully empowered over the past 14 years with black control of fishing quotas upward of 60%. However, the industrial fishing sector is presently crippled and hamstrung by inappropriate policy and a strangling bureaucracy.

The key elements of the DA’s policy for industrial fishing are as follows:

  • Fishing quotas to industrial quota holders must be more freely tradable. Right holders must be allowed to sell and manage their fishing quotas once allocated in order to maximise efficiencies and extract maximum value provided that these are done in a socially and ecologically responsible manner. The DA would substantially review the anachronistic and uncompetitive Transfer of Fishing Rights Policy.
  • All bureaucratic frameworks, policies and processes would be fundamentally reviewed in order to remove all unnecessary red-tape. For example, levies would be payable annually and all permit processes will allow self-issue via electronic means.
  • The landing of fish would not be conditional on the presence of fishery control officers as the Fisheries Branch would employ smart monitoring technologies, including an electronic three- point reporting programme, comprising e-logbooks, sales notes and VMS.
  • The state must pay for the scrapping of unnecessary fishing capacity and must consider implementing a fishing right ‘buy-back’ programme to support the recovery of overexploited fish stocks.

8.7. Recreational fishing

There are more than 500 000 recreational fishers in South Africa who harvest an array of species from lobsters, red bait and line fish to deep-water competitive fishing for billfish and tuna. Recreational fishers are responsible for substantial economic activity in coastal holiday villages and towns and support a variety of secondary industries such as boat-building and repair.

The DA would support the expansion of the recreational fishing sector by removing all unnecessary red-tape, particularly by reviewing the problematic manner in which permits are made available. For example, the DA would immediately put in place an electronic permit for recreational fisheries, which can be applied and paid for electronically and where the permit is issued immediately to the applicant’s smart-phone, tablet or other electronic device. The same mechanism would be implemented for non-commercial fish exports and imports. Information on how to apply for recreational fishing permits would be published in tourist brochures.

8.8. Foreign fishing vessels in South Africa waters

The DA would not permit any form of foreign fishing in South African waters as we believe that all our fish stocks that can be commercially fished, can be fished by South Africans.

Foreign fishing vessels would however be welcome to call at any South African port for stores, bunkers, fuel, the transhipment of fish and for other provisions provided that:

 Such vessels are not listed as being Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) on any regional or international management list.
 Such vessels are able to provide the requisite guarantees and insurances to pay for the costs of any salvage or pollution that may result from their presence in South African waters.

8.9. Research and patrol vessel management

South Africa’s fleet of fisheries research and patrol vessels have been recklessly managed. The management and maintenance of these vital South African assets must be in the hands of professional and internationally recognised ship managers who are able to provide value to the South African government.

8.10. Expanding the fisheries economy

The DA does not believe in increasing the number of quota holders in any of the current fisheries, whether industrial or small-scale. This is in accordance with the National Development Plan.

The expansion of the fisheries economy can only be undertaken by:

  • Identifying new commercially sustainable fisheries, such as a directed red-herring fishery.
  • Expanding the size of the horse-mackerel fishery through committed research.
  • Reducing bureaucratic costs.
  • Supporting product innovation, market diversification and beneficiation.
  • Subsidising the costs of obtaining eco-label certification for qualifying fisheries.
  • Supporting the expansion of aquaculture farms.

8.11. Innovation and green technologies fund

The DA would create a dedicated Innovation and Green Technologies Fund under the Marine Living Resources Fund to support:

  • Research into new commercial fisheries, fishing gear or fishing practices.
  • Investments into greener and more efficient technologies.
  • The establishment and entry into new markets.
  • The eco-labelling of qualifying fisheries.
  • The establishment of green aquaculture farms.

8.12. Fish farming

The production of farmed fish has largely stagnated. Fish farming provides a significant opportunity to reduce harvesting pressures on wild stocks and create important job opportunities in rural and coastal towns and villages.

Although South Africa has a comprehensive marine fish farming regulatory framework, the regulatory and bureaucratic hurdles are preventing the start-up small-scale fish farming projects.

The DA would promote small-scale fish farming where annual production is 10 tons or less by automatically granting farming permits provided that the prospective farmer:

  • Intends to farming with species that are not defined as being invasive aliens.
  • Has access to water and appropriately zoned land.

8.13. Recognising the skills of fishers

Indigenous fishermen must be recognised for the highly specialized task they perform. Among other things:

  • They must be recognized for the important role they play in the food security of South Africa.
  • Their skills must be recognised and they must be given recognition of prior learning against existing unit standards.
  • Training and assessment must be made accessible and delivered locally.
  • Local experts should be trained and employed as assessors to ensure authentic expertise.
  • Local indigenous knowledge should be incorporated in scientific assessments.

8.14. Halting the professional rot at the fisheries branch

The DA would immediately reverse the practice of employing unsuitable and unqualified persons at the Fisheries Branch. In addition, the current staff complement needs urgent review and right-sizing.

The politicisation of the management of the Fisheries Branch must be ended. The Fisheries Branch must be elevated to become the professional centre of excellence for fisheries management in the Southern Hemisphere.

  1. Oceans

Integrated coastal and oceans management is mandated by South African law, yet management of our oceans and coast is divested from fisheries. This lack of integration not only harms oceans management, it unnecessarily creates a huge and expensive duplicated bureaucracy in the form of the Oceans and Coasts Branch in the Department of Environmental Affairs. Oceans and coasts cannot be managed separately from fisheries and the DA would reintegrate management of our oceans, coasts and fisheries under a single regulatory authority.

9.1. Marine protected areas

South Africa had committed to protecting 20% of its sea space by 2012 during the 2003 World Parks Congress. To date, we protect less than 1.5% of our oceans. The DA will seek to rapidly protect our ocean space from fishing by creating networks of offshore marine protected areas aimed at stock recovery. Two urgent marine protected areas are needed to protect fish stocks at Childs Mound between the Groen and Spoeg Rivers and the Orange River cone area.

Marine protected areas must:

  • Function as a network of integrated of protected areas aimed at creating refuge for breeding commercial fish stocks.
  • Not alienate and threaten coastal access to fish and fisheries and must complement small-scale fishing.

9.2. Large marine ecosystem management

South Africa is a member of two large marine ecosystem (LME) programmes, the Benguela Current LME on the west coast and the Agulhas-Somali Current LME on the east coast. Neither of these critical LME programmes influence the management of fisheries in South Africa despite the fact that in terms of both LME programmes, the management methodologies and procedures of shared stock fisheries by member states must increasingly be harmonised.

9.3. Marine-based Ecotourism

South Africa’s marine-based ecotourism sectors are dominated by the extremely lucrative boat- based whale and dolphin watching, and white shark cage diving industries. However, both sectors are hamstrung by inappropriate policies and bureaucratic red-tape and unscientific limitation of the number of operators in defined areas.

The DA believes that the state should work with the tourism market to determine how many whale and dolphin watching and shark cage diving operators are able to operate profitably in any specific area.

The regulatory authority, together with the applicable industry management body, must ensure that all operators:

  • Adhere to strict safety codes.
  • Implement and adhere to responsible operator codes of practice aimed at protecting sharks, whales, dolphins and turtles.

Sunday, December 14, 2025

What to do with a problem called ABALONE?

 South African abalone is once again in the spotlight. The question is whether the latest fisheries minister - Willie Aucamp - is going to have gonads to actually put measures in place to fix South Africa's unchecked abalone poaching and corruption crises. 

What can Minister Aucamp do? What is incredible is the fact that he can put in place a suite of measures rapidly that will massively reduce poaching in the immediate term and benefit small-scale abalone divers from Paternoster to Pearly beach who are historically reliant on abalone. 

1. Increase the abalone TAC from 12 tons (!!) to ±600-700 tons and strictly implement and enforce the TURF management system. Have legal abalone divers displace illegal divers by keeping legal divers in the water for the maximum duration of the annual abalone season.

2.  Allocate long term 15-year duration fishing rights to abalone divers who have been without rights since 2013. This will ensure a sense of "ownership" and further ensure that divers are personally invested in the well-being and sustainability of abalone stocks. 

3. Co-manage the fishery with right holders.

4. Re-establish the dedicated "green courts" that had an 80% conviction rate when it existed and were responsible for the imprisonment and financial ruin of syndicate leaders like Jason Ross and Elizabeth Marks. 

5.  Re-establish and fund local-based enforcement and fishery oversight bodies.

6.  Clean up the corruption in the fisheries department and open up the entire sale processes of confiscated abalone (and lobster) to public scrutiny and oversight by the fisheries portfolio committee. 

ABALONE, CITES II & THE SUDDEN LISTING REMOVAL

South Africa was scheduled to have dried abalone (only) listed on Appendix II of CITES at COP 20 which was held in Uzbekistan until 5 December 2025. 

It has emerged that the SA delegation abandoned the listing proposal at the 11th hour and environmental organizations like the EMS Foundation are speculating about possible nefarious reasons for this last-minute decision linking it to the newly appointed Fisheries Minister and his apparent anti-conservationist stance (especially since Dion George has now magically labeled himself to be a "conservationist").  

[To digress, Mr George, the great "conservationist", increased the lobster TAC by 58% despite lobster stocks being under severe poaching pressure and biological stocks at less than 2% of pristine / historic levels. I am yet to see any conspiracy theories about this inexplicable increase in the lobster TAC, which massively benefited lobster exporters, in particular].

To list dried abalone - the form that poached abalone is almost exclusively exported in - on CITES II is theoretically commendable but not practically viable for South Africa. 

Listing on CITES II has significant practical obligations and administrative requirements which the South African fisheries department has proved completely incapable of implementing when abalone was listed under CITES III in 2007. Corruption and administrative incompetence would be the dream-ticket to even further ramp up the illegal abalone trade using CITES permits to boot. [Our last listing of abalone on CITES III resulted in unendorsed CITES permits being repeatedly used to launder illegal product, which directly contributed to the ramping up of illegal trade to the levels we see today.]

So what would it mean to have dried abalone listed on CITES II?

1. Firstly, the Fisheries Department would have to issue mandatory CITES export permits or re-export certificates. 

2. Secondly, the importing states (Hong Kong, China, Singapore, Vietnam) may introduce stricter requirements for the importation of the dried abalone.

Again, theoretically, this could work to seriously curtail the export of dried abalone if you had a competent and uncorrupted fisheries department. [Incidentally, the farmed abalone industry does not produce dried abalone so the conspiracy theory punted by environmental organizations about the new fisheries minister doing the farmed industry's bidding makes little sense.]

South Africa simply does not have the administrative capacity to process, evaluate and issue such permits. Coupled with the rampant corruption that is the fisheries department, to list dried abalone on CITES II would ONCE AGAIN have been catastrophic. 

That said, the DA's handling of this matter [and the removal of George as Minister] is a textbook case of stupidity and ANC-cadre-levels of incompetence. 

 

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Why Dion George's Removal as Fisheries Minister is a GOOD DECISION: Some Facts Not Considered by the Daily Maverick

The Daily Maverick has over the past few days since it emerged that Dion George would be removed as the SA Minister of Forestry, Fisheries & Environment published two substantial pieces preferring view points opposing and objecting to his removal. The premise of the objections is that his replacement - Willie Aucamp - is an avid hunter and close to the hunting lobby, drumming up fears that South Africa will somehow adopt a pro-canned hunting policy despite this being contrary to Aucamp's own party's publicly stated policies. 

If canned hunting is against DA policy and is certainly contrary to SA national ecological policy, then the fears being raised by the Daily Maverick pieces are misplaced in my view. 

There are some other facts as to why he was fired as the Minister responsible for forestry, FISHERIES & the environment. 

Dion George was most likely removed as fisheries minister because of his record of ridiculously bad decisions that ARE IN FACT CONTRARY TO DA POLICY.

He just took a series of awful decisions that are not only fatally bad in law (which is usual) but significantly harmful to entire Overberg and Cape Town communities reliant on abalone fishing. See here

Then, he simply continued to put his name to the same legally bad fishing quota allocation decisions taken by his predecessor, Barbara Creecy, resulting in a multiplicity of adverse court orders. On 4 November 2025, due to embarrassing bungling by his "legal advisors", George had to concede 3 small pelagic review cases in a single day with costs awarded against state. Some articles explaining how bad George was for commercial fishery sectors: here and here and here for a summary!

George's incompetence and insistence on relying on the same incompetent legal and fisheries management staff who advised Creecy, not only resulted in him taking indefensible decisions, he is now possibly facing a multiplicity of contempt of court applications for failing to take decisions by 31 October 2025 in numerous small pelagic matters. See here for that short piece.   

George was effectively being used as an unthinking tool to continue to implement the same bad ANC policies and decisions that have destroyed SA commercial fisheries. (Under 2 decades of SA fisheries mismanagement, our commercial fisheries have been decimated from once having 22 relatively healthy and thriving commercial fisheries to having 13 barely functional fisheries). 

In a 14 May 2025 article, I wrote the following about just how bad Dion George's grasp of fisheries management is; how his decisions are contrary to DA policy and historic positions and how he is simply putting his signature to bad ANC decisions:

"On 6 May 2025 (almost week after Minister George was required by the Western Cape High Court to publish his appeal decisions), Dion George issued his revised squid appeal decisions. The original appeal decisions taken by Barbara Creecy were reviewed and set aside by the Courts last year (as were dozens of hake long line and small pelagic decisions, but we digress). 

The squid appeal decisions are problematic for at least 2 reasons and once again demonstrate a Minister who lacks access to proper advisors and importantly demonstrates that the DA (As a political party) simply have no clue about fishing, policy and growth in this sector. And this is incredibly tragic given that, as an opposition party, the DA did actually have substantive policy and ideas to fix and grow fisheries!"

On 18 March 2025, I wrote about the "Foolishness of Dion George", where I stated the following: 

"Being the first DA appointed Fisheries Minister, we held out much hope that Dion George would significantly move away from the catastrophic policies and incompetent management that has defined fisheries management in this country for some 15 years now. 

ANC fisheries policy since Joemat-Petterssen has been defined by corruption, incompetence, typical redistribution of a contracting quota pie to more and more "fishers" with the consequnce that nearshore fisheries have essentially all collapsed and of the 22 healthy and functioning commercial fisheries we had back in 2005, we are down to 13 at best today. And yet we have 1000's more quota holders! 

The DA of course supposedly prides itself on its strategies of "growth", competence and collaboration with industry / fishers to grow the SA economy. Minister's George's leadeership since 3 July 2024 has been a copy-and-paste of the incompetence and dithering that has defined ANC mismanagement of our fisheries since Marthinus Van Schalkwyk. 

What makes George's leadership at fisheries so much more stark in his failure, is the plain-sight comparison to the radical changes his colleagues are making at Home Affairs and Public Works, for example. 

George could have - 

  • fixed the corruption and incompetence endemic in fisheries compliance and administration. He was given the names and evidence. 
  • refused to continue to implement ANC fisheries policies that simply allocate unviable and unsustainable quotas to "co-operative" communities led by sheisters and corrupt ANC-appointed chiefs.
  • undertaken a comprehensive review of current fisheries policies and instructed the urgent commencement of new fisheries development and thus fisheries sector growth. Again, he was given the information to do this. "

To conclude, George's performance as fisheries minister has been dismal and as if he was just another cadre deployee by the ANC. But it was not just at fisheries that he simply took awful decisions. He, for example, continued to issue shark net and drumlin permits to the KZN Sharks Board contrary to DA policy.